<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:remotereview.blog.co.uk,2009-11-10:/</id><title>Remote Review</title><link rel="self" href="http://remotereview.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://remotereview.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-10T03:32:11+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:remotereview.blog.co.uk,2008-10-28:/2007/07/31/terrible_taskings~2731384/#c8109480</id><title>In response to:Terrible Taskings</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://remotereview.blog.co.uk/2007/07/31/terrible_taskings~2731384/#c8109480"/><author><name>Druid</name></author><published>2008-10-28T13:44:22+01:00</published><updated>2008-10-28T13:44:22+01:00</updated><content type="html">Hello Marv, &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
ive got to do a pool so i'll be reading for tips here and there! : ) &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
cheers Druid</content></entry><entry><id>tag:remotereview.blog.co.uk,2007-08-19:/2007/07/31/terrible_taskings~2731384/#c4391591</id><title>In response to:Terrible Taskings</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://remotereview.blog.co.uk/2007/07/31/terrible_taskings~2731384/#c4391591"/><author><name>RedCairo</name></author><published>2007-08-19T21:04:46+02:00</published><updated>2007-08-19T21:04:46+02:00</updated><content type="html">Funny!  I have those too. Old taskings that I wrote like 7 years ago that are STILL in my envelope pool. I come upon them now and then and think, "What the hell was I thinking?!" I mean, even if I had answered the exact question with a photo, geographic coordinates, a detailed sketch, and a youtube video, I would STILL not actually have the info that I truly needed. Doh!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
PS Does it ever strike you as odd, the way that targets with no feedback seem to have so much more great data and contact than targets with hard clear photo feedback? It is one of the great mysteries of RV. Or psychology. Or humor. ;-)</content></entry><entry><id>tag:remotereview.blog.co.uk,2007-07-18:/2007/06/14/remote_viewing_superman_an_experiment~2451933/#c4106502</id><title>In response to:Remote Viewing Superman: An Experiment</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://remotereview.blog.co.uk/2007/06/14/remote_viewing_superman_an_experiment~2451933/#c4106502"/><author><name>caviac</name></author><published>2007-07-18T08:36:52+02:00</published><updated>2007-07-18T08:36:52+02:00</updated><content type="html">Very interesting study.&lt;br&gt;
I'm member from TKR rv's site and sure about the gys that have made the sessions.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It can be extrapolated to other configurations very easily....who will task about "GOD" ?&lt;br&gt;
This is another study because it doesn't seem to exist or not in a life form but just to be or not to be !&lt;br&gt;
An it's more complicated because it is entering in religion and own personal position on this subject. The problem will surely be ion this case that practicers will describe god as they feel it, and no believers will have the same doubt we have seen for superman....&lt;br&gt;
But that would be another study... ;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Very good job and idea.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Good blog too, contionue ! :)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
caviac</content></entry><entry><id>tag:remotereview.blog.co.uk,2007-07-16:/2007/07/12/remote_viewing_a_theoretical_investigati~2621091/#c4084972</id><title>In response to:Remote Viewing: A Theoretical Investigation of the State of the Art</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://remotereview.blog.co.uk/2007/07/12/remote_viewing_a_theoretical_investigati~2621091/#c4084972"/><author><name>Joe Smouse</name></author><published>2007-07-16T10:44:38+02:00</published><updated>2007-07-16T10:44:38+02:00</updated><content type="html">Hey cool Blog Marv. Don't forget to come do some tandems. </content></entry><entry><id>tag:remotereview.blog.co.uk,2007-06-14:/2007/06/14/remote_viewing_superman_an_experiment~2451933/#c3794811</id><title>In response to:Remote Viewing Superman: An Experiment</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://remotereview.blog.co.uk/2007/06/14/remote_viewing_superman_an_experiment~2451933/#c3794811"/><author><name>Panamon</name></author><published>2007-06-14T16:44:28+02:00</published><updated>2007-06-14T16:44:28+02:00</updated><content type="html">What to say, Marv? Cool!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Well, I think sessions needed for this kind of experiment should be much more than these, but results are interesting in any case...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One thing is: I think you should mention also how sessions ended up, I mean what the viewers thought the target was in their conclusions: for example (I am the guy who doubted about existence of a feedback) during phase 4 I finished my session AOLing the bag of a motorbyke! This seems important to me, even if we are not talking about "how good results of RV are in general", but just in case of non-existing targets.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And well, the concept/idea of superman EXISTS! In the collective memory of the whole humanity. You tasked really well with that "DESCRIBE THE *FORM OF LIFE*..."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But, for example: what if a viewer ended her/his session talikng about Superman? :-P&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't know... Does this mean that (in some universe? ;-)) Superman is an existing form of life?&lt;br&gt;
[uhm.. well, the realm of possibilities is endless isn't it?]&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, this kind of experiments are really cool, Marv! I personally believe that many viewers of the DojoPsi would agree to RV also "experimental missions" together with the usual weekly missions. For experimental missions I mean something like this one, or RVing yourself during the session, or other people's results, or maybe how would you feel if you didn't have a brain, and so on. I am sure it's easy to find lots of targets with huge implications here :-)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks a lot Marv, and good luck with this nice blog!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Panamon&lt;br&gt;
</content></entry></feed>
